On
Gay Marriage
Penny Nixon - MCC
San Francisco,San Francisco, CA, USA
On
Gay Marriage
A Sermon by Rev.
Dr. G. Penny Nixon, MCC San Francisco
I think one of
the things that MCC San Francisco does is bring balance to the universe because
in churches and in other religious institutions all across America today,
they’ll be talking about the gay marriages happening this weekend in San
Francisco, but perhaps not in the same way that we’ll be talking about it.
Certainly we have many people and churches alike in solidarity with us, but you
know that the vast majority of sermons this morning will mention the demise of
the family, mention the erosion of the foundational institution of marriage and
family.
But I want to say
that today we are not victims of discrimination any more, but victors; that we
are not second-class citizens but citizens with full rights in this moment in
this city, and that we are part of social change. And marriage has been a
rallying cry, has been in fact, the nexus of a lot of the debate and the
rhetorical arguments that go on and on about what family means and what love
means and who has rights and who actually is part of the constitution and who
is not. Those are the things that we want to lift up this morning. And to lift
up that marriage and the right of anyone to marriage has vast implications. If
same-sex marriage is ever legal in this country, it’ll make all kinds of
differences for all kinds of people; from multi-national couple to adoptive
parents.
But before I talk
about that and talk about this very interesting story of the golden calf in the
desert (because I know you’re thinking, “What is she going to say about that?”)
I want to tell a personal story.
Many of you know
that I’ve been away on vacation for a couple of weeks. And the first week
Annlee, my partner of eleven years, and a couple of friends of ours went to
Canada. And so, unbeknownst to Annlee, I thought, “Ok, we’re going to Canada;
we’re going to Whistler; we’re going to ski but we could always get married at
the same time." So I went online and found out that indeed Whistler
Village had Marriage Commissioners and so, with our friends, we actually ended
up getting married on the slopes at Whistler …. So, I came back all fired up to
say, “And in Canada ….” But we totally got
pre-empted.
Some of our
friends, I think, were a bit shocked because we’ve been a very non-traditional
couple in many ways over the years and last year, when we celebrated our 10th
anniversary we exchanged some vows together that were really lovely. We did
this in Canada, yes as an affirmation of our love, but also as a political
statement and it really was an amazing, amazing moment. And when we went to the
municipality in Canada, everyone was like, “Congratulations. Congratulations.”
And it was almost like we were just waiting for someone to do something or to
say something, and not an eye was batted. And it was just so weird to come back
here and then start hearing all this news in San Francisco.
It was a
wonderful event and sure enough within days it got put to the test as we went
through U.S. Immigration coming out of Vancouver and into the U.S. They give
you a declaration form, one per household. We fill out one; we hand it to the
man. He says, “What’s the nature of your relationship?” And simultaneously we
say, “We’re legally married.” They said, “That won’t fly here.” So I came back
all fired up, but it does fly in San Francisco.
That evening
after the Marriage Commissioner signed the license, I thought, “You know I am
going to frame this and put it on my wall.” And then I thought, “In all the
straight homes I’ve been in, I don’t think I’ve ever seen a marriage license
framed and hanging on the wall.” And not that that would influence my
decision... you know I’ll do what I want anyway, but I’m just saying that for
us, it hasn’t been a privilege we've enjoyed. And I thought, this is not the
same but it is not unlike, an African-American in the Civil Right’s movement
going, "I’m going to drink from that fountain because it’s the law."
It’s not unlike a woman going to vote for the first time and saying, "I’m
going to the polls. You can’t stop me because it’s the law." And there’s
something so empowering about that. "It’s the law." Even if only for
a few moments here in our great City by the Bay.
So what does this
have to do with the golden calf? Nothing... No, it really doesn’t. This was the
text that I had worked on before all this came about, but as I’ve been thinking
about it, it actually does have something to do with it. The people of Israel,
for those of you that don’t know the story (though I’m sure you’ve seen the
movie), were freed from Egypt and they went through the Red Sea only to wander
in the desert. And after they’re wandering awhile, Moses goes up on the hill to
talk to God, this God who had liberated them. The people are wandering around
and they’re getting antsy and they’re beginning to doubt their liberation and
their freedom. And they’re thinking, “This freedom was supposed to be real
great but you know what? It’s hot out here. I've got sand in my ears. I haven’t
had a good meal in months. And what about this God? Where is this God?”
And so they say
to Aaron who is Moses’ brother, “Let’s build a god. Let’s build a golden calf.”
And so, I don’t know how they do this in the desert without all the tools they
would need, but they have everyone take off their gold jewelry and they melt it
down and they build this golden calf. Now, why a golden calf? You know I
wondered that for years and you won’t find it in many commentaries but as I
studied the gods and goddesses around the world a few years ago, I realized
that the goddess Hathor is one of the main goddesses of Egypt and she’s
actually an ancient cow deity.
Her picture was
everywhere and her head is shaped like a cow’s head. And she was also the
goddess of gold. So I imagine the people all of a sudden began to image a god
more like that than the one that Moses had led them to and began to reconstruct
what was really the god of their oppression, Egypt, because sometimes that’s
what happens.
When we get
liberated, or when a people gets liberated, we know that historically, it is
often true that those very same people can then turn around, in governments
especially, and use the same oppressive structures. And you know what? I think
we do that spiritually sometimes and we don’t even realize it. We recreate the
gods of our oppression and then we wonder why we have all this freedom and
liberation but we don’t feel a lot different internally or why our spirituality
doesn’t look different than it used to.
It is not enough
to come out as a gay person and say, “I’m gay and I’m a Christian and it’s ok.”
That’s a good thing, sure. But you know what? When you come out and you’re ok
with who you are and you celebrate who you are, all bets are off. It means that
you start building a different theological system, a different spirituality
that at its center is all about liberation. And if we ever bring the god of
oppression back into this place, then the people should rise up and say, “No,
that is not our god. That is not the God of liberation for all.”
And so, when I’m
thinking about this story of the golden calf and the people wandering around,
what I really thought was this: In all the joy and the jubilation of this
incredible historic moment, I don’t want us to make an idol out of marriage.
Not all same-sex marriages are sacred. A marriage is only sacred if the people
in it treat it, and each other, as such. That is what makes a marriage sacred.
That is what makes all relationships sacred (or not).
Conservative
religion has made an idol out of marriage. They worship the form of marriage
without regard for its essence. Ok, the form, one man and one woman. That’s
what gets worshiped. We all know in this room that the American household is
one of the least safe places to be. We know about domestic violence; we know
about abuse; we know these things. It is not the form that makes anything
sacred but the essence. And while today we celebrate with our whole selves this
human and civil right for queer people, let us not make an idol out of marriage
and recreate any gods of our oppression in the past.
What we celebrate
today is not the institution of marriage, we celebrate equality and that is a
different thing. Yes, marriage can be celebrated because it is a holy endeavor
but it stops being holy if the people in the marriage stop treating each other
with the basic spiritual values that we hold sacred in this place: integrity
and respect and dignity and honor and truth-telling and faithfulness, however
those agreements are made in your relationships. I don’t want us to make an
idol out of marriage because I want us to remember where we came from. I don’t
want us to put a hierarchy on relationships in saying that marriage is the
ultimate. Marriage is work, ok? It’s a wonderful terror really. We don’t want
to recreate a hierarchy that makes anybody in our community less than anyone
else.
We celebrate all
kinds of relationships in this place. Bill and Fernando got married. I hope
that you saw them on the news, these two sitting here with the buttons that say
“I do.” Well, you know half the country saw them. It was great. All right. They
don’t have a traditional relationship and they haven’t for years. Fernando
Orlandi argued on the floor of General Conference of the Universal Fellowship
of Metropolitan Community Churches to change the language which describes Holy
Unions, to include "between two or more people." We didn’t want it to
be limited to just two, in case people wanted to constellate their relationships
differently. Fernando argued on the floor of General Conference saying, “Hello,
we’re the gay church. Ok? We need to find different ways to honor as sacred the
ways that people choose to have kinship with one another.”
Today if you are
single (and I don’t even like to use that word) but if you’re not in a
relationship where you’re moving toward marriage or you’re in a committed
partnership however you constellate that in your own intimacy, and you’re not
going to move toward marriage, great. No hierarchy. Every relationship that we
treat with dignity is sacred and that is what is so important. Let us not
recreate any oppressive systems or gods or hierarchies that make anybody for
any moment less than anybody else. We can rejoice with those who rejoice and we
can support couples in the agreements they make with each other and we can
support the agreements that friends make, the agreements that households make,
the agreements that lovers make together. What is most important is how we love
each other, how we are committed to each other and how we keep our word with
one another. That is what’s important. That we’ve been recognized legally for
this moment is frosting on the cake. That’s great; that’s equality. But that
doesn’t mean that anybody’s relationship is less than anyone else’s. And we
honor and we uphold and we recognize those couples today and later they’ll be
invited to be consecrated in this sacred space, but with your blessing.
You know over
here sits my friend, Beth of twenty-plus years, and we made a covenant twenty
years ago to always be in each others’ lives, to always care for each others’
families in sickness and in health ‘til death do us part. We made that
commitment and no, we’re not married. She is with her partner Fiona and I can
say out loud in front of all of you, “’Til death do us part” and you know what?
Fiona thinks that that’s the greatest thing in the world.” It’s the sacredness
of relationships. When Beth and I have had our hard times, when we’ve gone our
separate ways, it’s that covenant that has brought us back together again and
the values that we hold most dearly. Relationships are sacred because of what
we bring to them.
One of the things
that I read that touched me most deeply about this same-sex marriage issue was
the argument and the debate on the floor of the Massachusetts Senate when Senator Diane Wilkerson drew upon her
experience as an African-American growing up in Arkansas where the hospital did
not allow her mother to deliver her children. “I know the pain of being less
than equal and I cannot and will not impose that status on anyone else,” a
teary-eyed Wilkerson said. “I could not in good conscience ever vote to send
anyone to that place from which my family fled.”
You know what,
friends? Justice if not shared is justice diminished. Joy if not shared dies
young. You see, Senator Wilkerson took her own experience of discrimination and
being a second-class citizen in this country and as a straight,
African-American woman joined arms in solidarity with the queer community and
said, “You know what? As a public official and as a person, I will never
condone anyone being less than a full citizen in this democracy of this United
States of America.” That is solidarity.
And if this
marriage thing does anything to us besides make us jubilant, besides affirm
legally and socially our unions as equal, then what it should do is this: it
should propel us to join arms with anyone and everyone who does not have full
rights in this country for any reason and to say, “We want everybody to have
this feeling. Like, wow, I actually got recognized as a full citizen just
once.”
Let us not ever
(I’m speaking to myself here first) take for granted the privileges that we
have. Some of us in this room have a house, have shelter, have a job, have
health, have certain rights and others of us don’t. And so now, knowing what it
is to have a privilege that we didn’t have, let us extend that spiritually,
politically, and emotionally to other issues with those around us who have less
than others do and who don’t know what it is to have some privileges that
others have.
It’s going to be
a fight but let us fight with joy. And when we communicate who we are, let us
never do it in a way that diminishes anyone else. This is about equality. If
you’re gonna build an idol, build it to Equality. If you’re gonna worship a
God, worship a God who is a God of liberation for all people. And then as Judy
Chicago says, “We will all live in harmony with each other and the earth and
everywhere will be called Eden once again.” Amen.