Metropolitan
Community Churches
Board of
Administration Face-to-Face Meeting
Present:
Rev Jeff
Miner (Chair)
Julie
Krueger (Secretary)
Barb
Crabtree
Marvin Bagwell
Stephen Harte
Absent:
John
Vespa
In Attendance:
Rev Dr
Cindi Love, Executive Director
Rev
Elder Nancy Wilson, Moderator (for part of call)
Connie
Meadows, Assistant to the Moderator
1. Weekend
Meeting Overview
The Board had a joint meeting with the Board
of Elder’s on Friday, September 14 to review Elder’s work plans and the
corresponding budget items. On Saturday,
September 15, the Board began the 2008 Budget discussion with Rev. Elder Nancy
Wilson and Rev. Dr. Cindi Love. The
budget discussion was finished Sunday morning, September 16, and the remaining
agenda items were completed Sunday afternoon.
2.
2008 Budget
Discussion
a) Contingency Reserve
Update
$400,000 from the proceeds of the building
sale was placed into a contingency reserve, which is being held with an
additional $3M in the Merrill Lynch Investment account. Due to decreased July and August tithes,
funds from the contingency reserve have been used to help cover the past two
months of operating expenses, resulting in a reserve balance of $220,000. The Executive Director anticipates that we
will need to use the remainder of these funds between now and the end of the
year unless there is a significant increase in tithe income or significant
spending cuts. $125,000 is in escrow for
the capital gains tax on the property.
The Executive Director recommended that we
adopt spending cuts for the balance of 07 and for 08, and that, as savings are
achieved, the reserve be replenished before any additional programming is
authorized. The Board unanimously agreed
with these two operating principles.
First the Board discussed how to achieve these objectives in 08, then
for the balance of 07.
b) Possible areas of
reduction for 08.
The
current working budget for 08 is $3,300,000.
A conservative income estimate for 08 is $2,874,500. The Board does not
feel comfortable adopting a budget that would exceed $2,800,000. Below are some recommendations for reaching
$2,800,000.
1. Responsiveness and
availability of data is critical to managing costs and should be improved.
2. Discipline and
well-defined parameters will help keep travel costs in line.
3. CRI needs to be
assessed, and then a reformulation/recommendation needs to come back to the Board
– estimated time of 6 months.
4.
The interim/transitional ministry is a must and has experienced great
success over the past few years. We need a strategy about who is going for
training, for example every pastor going into our 40 churches in transition
should get second course training. Criteria
for training needs to be defined. Is
there a way to consolidate CRI and transitional ministry?
5. The Executive
Director is working with the teams for Latin America,
6. $226,000 in savings
needs to be achieved through a reduction in work force and other salary/benefit
adjustments. Insofar as possible, these
adjustments need to be made so it does not destabilize the Elders and their
assistants. For example, the Elder’s made it clear that they would hope there
will not be reductions in healthcare benefits.
7. In the past, there
has been a policy preventing Elders from raising money for particular areas of
ministry (as opposed to the general budget).
The Board hereby eliminates this policy.
8. Salaries and
benefits will be paid for persons involved in the following programs, but all
other expenses fall outside the 2008 budget and must be funded from specific
contributions to those programs:
Children & Youth
HIV/Drug Literacy
Mother of Peace
MCC GLSEN
PAD
Global Justice (
9. HIV, Latin America,
Global Justice and
10. Church Planting and
CRI in 2008 will cost $38, 500. The Board
recommends reassessing these programs from a holistic, strategic viewpoint.
11. Travel moratorium
in first quarter will save $24,500.
12. Public report of
tithes will promote transparency, keep member congregation’s fully informed
about the extent to which sister congregations are keeping our mutual covenant,
and encourage many to keep current with their tithes.
13. Annual cost for
fund development position, admin assistant and accountant is $250,000. The Board authorizes that up to $250,000 from
the Merrill Lynch investment account can be used to fund these three positions
in 2008. It is our hope that the fund
development could raise $250,000 in the first year, which would be us in a
break-even position. We believe these
three positions are critical to our ability to generate new revenue streams to
help relieve some of the pressure on the budget.
14. The Board suggests
that a love offering be taken during an Elder’s visit – not for travel but for
ministry areas.
15. Recommend raising
the fees for regional conferences, fully understanding that this might not be
possible in certain regions. Also,
consider combining conferences. For
example, could we ask region 2 to combine its conference with regions 3 and 5
in 2009? These are just some examples of
where $20-30K savings could be obtained.
16. The Moderator is
going to explore options for raising $250,000 a year for three years until our
Fund Development operation is in full swing.
We began the day with a preliminary budget
of $3,300,000 and the above mentioned items reduce this to $2,850,000. The Board asks Nancy and Cindy to go back to
the Elders and find a way to cut another $50,000 in order to get us to
$2,800,000.
Jeff Miner moved to approve the
aforementioned modifications to the budget in addition to authorizing the
hiring of the three persons mentioned above.
Barb Crabtree seconded the motion and it was approved unanimously. Up to $250,000 from the Merrill Lynch account
can be used for the three positions without coming back to the Board for
approval, with the understanding that as revenue improves priority will be
given to replenishing reserves.
c) Recommendations for
the remainder of 07.
If we
annualize our current financial position, we would be over budget by $500,000
by the end of the year. We are currently
over by $385,000. Income is pretty much
on target; it is the expenses that are out of line. The Board recommends the following:
1. Moratorium on
travel unless ticket is non-refundable, no-exchangeable. For emergency travel consult both Executive
Director and Moderator.
2. Moratorium on all discretionary
expenses incurred by employees outside their offices, phone, or computers. Exception possible if approved by Executive
Director and Moderator.
3. Approval to use
cash reserves for operating expenses if necessary. However, the Executive Director will keep a
log of cash withdrawn from reserves, and a priority goal is to restore the
reserve as soon as possible.
3.
2008
Objectives/Initiatives
a) Segmentation Model
The Board believes that application of an
adapted corporate “segmentation” model to MCC operations would greatly increase
effectiveness and also help keep operating costs down. We would like to set aside half a day during the
March 08 joint Board/Elders meeting to discuss this concept and how it might be
applied to MCC operations. The Moderator
agreed to reserve a half day on the March agenda, and the Executive Director,
Barb, and Connie agreed to hold a meeting in the near-term to begin to pull
together data and analysis for that discussion.
b)
Investment Committee
This committee agreed to meet once a month with
Merrill Lynch. Connie Meadows agreed to
sit on the committee and take notes. The
committee will update the Board during our monthly meetings. The committee members are Marsha Warren
(Chair), Barb Crabtree, Marvin Bagwell, Connie Meadows and Rev. Dr. Cindi Love as
an ad hoc member.
c)
New Board Appointment
The Elders, who are responsible for
appointing Board members, currently have two applicants for the Board
vacancy. However, it is the sense of the
Board that ideally MCC should strive to achieve a broader range of applicants
before making such important appointments.
The Board recommended that the Elders extend the deadline period for
applications. The Board then
brainstormed possible names of people who could be invited to apply.
d)
Advisory Committees
The
Board discussed whether it should create subcommittees as a way of managing its
workload and gaining exposure to individuals who might be good future Board
members. Options discussed included the
following:
Investment
Committee – This committee already exists, but its membership could be
diversified.
Audit committee – the objective of this
committee would be to liaison with the auditor and oversee the audit
process. The committee could also advise
on-site operational audits in our local churches when asked to do so. Possible members for this committee would be
Barb Crabtree, John Vespa (if willing) and a new person.
e)
Senior Housing
A very attractive potential site has been
identified for the senior housing project.
The Executive Director will meet with Affirmative Equities and the
realtors in the next 30 days. When a
draft is completed, the Board needs to review the pro forma business plan that
is currently being put together. We also
need to decide who will sit on the Board of the CCRC.
We agreed that the Board of the CCRC should
have a minimum of 5 members, and we agreed that the majority of the Board
members should come from the Board. For
additional members, we need to look for people who have deep interest in both
the ministry and investment potential of the CCRC.
From the Board, Julie and Marvin are willing
to sit on the CRCC Board, and John Vespa will be asked. From the Elders, Rev. Elder Nancy Wilson and Rev.
Elder Arlene Ackerman will be approached.
The Executive Director agreed to serve as an ad-hoc, non-voting member. We then brainstormed possible names of others
(not on the Board or Elders) who might be asked to join the CCRC Board.
f)
2008 Board Meetings.
The next
Board face-to-face meeting is scheduled for March 7-9; Elders 9-15 in
March 6 travel day
Meet March 7-8
Joint meeting March 9
Then travel home
g)
Planned Giving
The Executive Director briefed the Board on
a preliminary proposal from the Sunshine Foundation to partner with MCC in a
joint planned giving program which they would be administrator. After
discussion, the Board concluded that more detailed information is needed to
assess the feasibility of such a partnership.
The Executive Director will ask the Foundation to submit a written
proposal that fleshes out the details.
4.
Meeting Adjourned
The meeting was closed in prayer and
adjourned.